All Cases


15 Court Cases
Court Case
Sep 4, 2026
Wooden gavel
  • LGBTQ+ Equality|
  • +1 Issue

OUTMemphis v. Skrmetti (formerly OUTMemphis v. Lee)

In Tennessee, an individual who is convicted under the generic Prostitution statute – which prohibits engaging in, or offering to engage in, sexual activity for compensation – faces a small fine and minimal jail time. While this is by no means inconsequential, Tennessee has also chosen to criminalize what it calls “Aggravated Prostitution.” Aggravated Prostitution is identical to Prostitution, with one key additional element: knowledge that one is living with HIV. Unlike Prostitution, Aggravated Prostitution is a felony that requires lifetime registration as a “violent sex offender.” The law ignores underlying circumstances; neither consent nor the use of mitigation (such as condoms, ART, or PrEP) are defenses. Indeed, the statute applies even when the alleged sexual activity poses no risk of HIV transmission whatsoever; and the registration requirement is automatic. People charged with Aggravated Prostitution in Tennessee are most often cisgender and transgender women who engage in sex work to meet basic needs like food, shelter, or other necessities, the vast majority of whom are Black women. Indeed, in 2022, a Black woman in Tennessee was 290 times more likely to be on the sex offender registry for an HIV-related conviction than a white man. Plaintiff OUTMemphis—a leading service provider of HIV testing, outreach and education in the Midsouth region—has joined four cisgender and transgender women forced to register for life as “sex offenders” due to their Aggravated Prostitution convictions to force Tennessee to abandon its illegal disability discrimination. The ADA is intended to address discrimination against people with disabilities in critical areas like employment and housing. Yet under Tennessee’s HIV laws, people convicted of Aggravated Prostitution are effectively barred from many employment opportunities, housing options, and public spaces as well as family and community life: they are, for example, forbidden from working, living, or even spending short amounts of time within 1,000 feet of a school, playground, park, or other area where children gather. In large cities like Memphis, finding work and housing outside these vast and ever-changing registry “Exclusion Zones” is nearly impossible. Tennessee, and many other states, passed HIV-criminalization laws in the panicked early days of the AIDS epidemic. Over the last decade, many states have reformed their laws in recognition of the scientific consensus that such measures do not reduce the prevalence of HIV but rather risk doing the opposite: by criminalizing knowledge of one’s HIV status, states like Tennessee disincentivize at-risk individuals from seeking HIV testing and erode the trust in medical professionals that is needed to successfully access treatment and limit transmission. Despite clear evidence that HIV laws, and especially laws requiring sex offender registration, do not work, Tennessee stands alone in the harshness and arbitrariness of its statutory scheme.
Court Case
Jun 24, 2026
Wooden gavel
  • Free Speech & Censorship|
  • +1 Issue

Blount Pride, Inc. v. Desmond

Blount Pride, Inc. (“Blount Pride”) planned a Pride event that would feature drag performances, including a performance by drag queen Flamy Grant. The event was to occur on September 2, 2023 at Maryville College in Maryville, Tennessee. On August, 29, 2023, four days before the event, District Attorney for Tennessee’s Fifth Judicial District, Ryan Desmond, issued a letter to Blount Pride saying that he would enforce the anti-drag law that had been passed in 2022. In an effort to protect the free speech rights of drag performers, ACLU-TN and attorneys Brice Timmons, Melissa Stewart, Daniel Horwitz, Melissa Dix, and Justin Gilbert filed a complaint and emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on August 30, 2023 on behalf of Blount Pride and Christian artist and drag performer Flamy Grant. United States District Court Judge Ronnie Greer, in the Eastern District of Tennessee, granted the temporary restraining order and the Pride event proceeded as planned. Defendants then agreed to a preliminary injunction while a previously filed challenge to the anti-drag law, Friends of George’s v. Mulroy, continued on appeal in the Sixth Circuit.
Court Case
Apr 23, 2024
gavel hovering over logo with case name, file stamp on top
  • Gender Equality|
  • +1 Issue

Doe et al. v. Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security et al.

Court Case
Oct 6, 2023
Wooden gavel
  • LGBTQ+ Equality|
  • +1 Issue

Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc. v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.

Court Case
Apr 20, 2023
Wooden gavel
  • LGBTQ+ Equality

L.W. v. Skrmetti | U.S. v. Skrmetti

Samantha and Brian Williams of Nashville and their 15-year-old daughter, as well as two other anonymous families and Dr. Susan N. Lacy challenged a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for transgender people under 18.
Court Case
Nov 4, 2021
Luc Esquivel holding golf club.
  • LGBTQ+ Equality

L.E. v. Lee

Luc Esquivel is a 14-year-old freshman at Farragut High School in Knoxville, TN who has been looking forward to trying out for the boys’ golf team, but his plans were derailed when Gov. Bill Lee signed SB 228 into law. This law banned students from participating in school sports.
Court Case
Jun 25, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Free Speech & Censorship|
  • +1 Issue

Bongo Productions, LLC et al. v. Lawrence et al.

Court Case
Mar 4, 2016
Placeholder image
  • LGBTQ+ Equality

Stopping Discrimination Against Transgender Youth in Sumner County

Sumner County Schools has a policy which prohibits transgender students from using the restroom or locker room facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
Court Case
Feb 8, 2016
Placeholder image
  • LGBTQ+ Equality

Students’ Right to Form Gay Straight Alliance Club in Franklin County