All Cases

3 Court Cases
Court Case
May 04, 2026
Stylized collage featuring the scales of justice, a judge’s gavel, and a person speaking—symbolizing law, accountability, and the power of public voice.
  • Privacy, Surveillance and Technology|
  • +1 Issue

No Kings Memphis and the Kendrick Consent Decree

On April 1, 2026, the ACLU of Tennessee sent a letter to Independent Monitor Edward L. Stanton III urging him to investigate whether the Memphis Police Department’s conduct on March 28 during the No Kings rally violated the Kendrick Consent Decree. The decree is a landmark federal court order that places limits on how MPD can surveil, monitor, and intimidate people who are exercising their constitutional rights. During the rally, MPD officers grabbed protest marshals from behind, pepper-sprayed Memphians at close range, and arrested peaceful demonstrators. In the letter, the ACLU-TN urged an investigation into whether: 1) MPD’s forcible intervention interfered with First Amendment activity and was intended to deter future protest; 2) MPD failed to seek required director authorization before intervening, as the decree stipulates; and 3) photographs, body-worn camera footage, or other intelligence gathered at the march were preserved or shared in ways that violate the decree’s strict restrictions on surveillance and information sharing. The city responded on April 15 by confirming an independent investigation. That same day, the state dropped charges against the three peaceful demonstrators arrested during the march.
Court Case
Jul 25, 2018
Placeholder image
  • Privacy, Surveillance and Technology|
  • +2 Issues

Blanchard et al. v. City of Memphis

Court Case
Mar 02, 2017
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Legal Reform|
  • +3 Issues

BLACKLISTED: Memphis Police Surveillance and Kendrick v. Chandler – A Timeline

ACLU-TN has had an ongoing concern over police surveillance of Memphis residents engaging in protected free speech activities for many decades.